what did dr. henry morris have to say about the flat earth theory

They think this position is an embarrassment (one has even called it a 'scandal') to evangelicalism. Then they go on to patronizingly deplore the supposed anti-intellectualism of what they call 'young-earth creationism' (this is their term we prefer 'biblical creationism' or 'literal creationism'). Every such group must turn to either the 'local flood theory' or the 'tranquil flood theory' if they are going to hold to the geologic ages, since a global cataclysm such as the Bible describes would have destroyed all evidence for the geologic ages. Some still resort to the unscientific 'gap theory' which seeks to insert the 'ages' between the first two verses of Genesis. Some do criticize and reject Darwinian evolution, but then will still allow some other form of evolution-'creative evolution,' 'pantheistic evolution,' 'punctuational evolution,' or something. Some will frankly advocate 'theistic evolution,' but others will call it 'process creation,' 'progressive creation,' 'multiple creation,' or some other term, implying that they still believe in some sort of “creation.” Various interpretive devices have been suggested by Bible expositors as they try to convert the six-day creation record of Genesis into billions of years. We strongly believe that it is a serious mistake when Bible-believing Christians compromise with the great ages demanded by the evolutionists. This compromise is necessary, they say, in order to win scientists and other intellectuals to the Lord. They feel that they must somehow reinterpret the Genesis record of creation to allow for billions of prehistoric years, which the evolutionists must have in order to make cosmic evolution and biological evolution seem feasible. Many evangelical leaders today, unfortunately, have capitulated to the evolutionary timescale of modern unbelieving geologists and astronomers.

What did dr. henry morris have to say about the flat earth theory